How many people has UK evacuated from Afghanistan? Boris slammed for empty promises

Kabul: James Heappey on leaving people behind in Afghanistan

Sign up to receive our rundown of the day’s top stories direct to your inbox

Invalid email

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info

Western leaders are abdicating their responsibilities in Afghanistan, people claim, as they end decades of military occupation. The Taliban overran Kabul over the weekend, filling the vacuum left by the US and its allies and endangering locals who have aided them for years. Harsh criticism has landed on national leaders – Boris Johnson and his cabinet among them – as they risk cutting rescue operations without evacuating their fair share of vulnerable Afghans.

How many people has the UK evacuated from Afghanistan?

Western nations have spent decades in Afghanistan, clashing with the Taliban as they hosted al-Queda following the 9/11 attacks in 2001.

Residents had translated for and guided troops during their occupation and now require refuge from the Taliban as it hopes to route the American allied presence.

In a bid to meet their responsibilities, each invading nation agreed to take in and resettle a bare minimum of Afghan refugees.

The US, Canada and European countries have agreed to welcome the following numbers of Afghan refugees:

  • UK: 5,000 in 2021, 20,000 total
  • US: 22,000
  • Canada: 20,000
  • Germany: Calls for 10,000
  • France: No pledge, only evacuating French nationals and support workers

READ MORE: ‘Save our soldiers!’ Britons urge Boris not to send troops back to war

How many people UK evacuated from Afghanistan Boris Johnson resettlement scheme evg

How many people has UK evacuated from Afghanistan? Boris slammed for empty promises (Image: GETTY)

Afghanistan refugees: Afghanistan refugees

Afghanistan refugees: Refugees are currently taking planes out of the country from Kabul airfield (Image: GETTY)

The UK Government’s pledge comes after officials also promised to evacuate 7,000 Britons and their Afghan staff.

But according to armed forces minister James Heappey, the country’s time is now limited.

The military managed to evacuate 963 people from Kabul on Thursday and aims to take another 1,000 today.

Their time is limited, however, by an “air bridge” to Kabul airport.

Afghanistan refugees: Afghan refugees

Afghanistan refugees: Afghan refugee concentrations across the UK (Image: EXPRESS)

The bridge could last between two and 10 days, according to Mr Heappey, meaning the Government can’t stay until “absolutely everyone is out”.

Failing to evacuate enough people before time runs out would see the PM’s pledge dashed a matter of days after launch.

The Prime Minister announced the resettlement scheme on Tuesday, pledging to prioritise women, children and religious minorities.

At the time, the Prime Minister said the UK owes a “debt of gratitude” to military aides.

DON’T MISS

POLL: Should Raab resign as crucial Afghanistan phone call not made? – POLL

Will the Afghanistan crisis result in another refugee crisis? – EXPLAINER

UK troops dealing with ‘hundreds and hundreds’ of Afghans meant for US – ANALYSIS

Afghanistan refugees: Afghanistan

Afghanistan refugees: The UK has already prepared (Image: GETTY)

He added he was “proud” to place the programme, despite accusations officials told 100 British embassy guards they are not eligible for Government protection.

British officials have started sending special forces personnel out searching for eligible people to pass through Taliban checkpoints and “maximise capacity” as uncertainty grows.

But some planes are leaving without meeting their capacity, according to one Twitter poster.

British expat Paul Farthing wrote on Twitter that his wife Kaisa had managed to catch a Norwegian flight but that the “aircraft is empty”.

Now, a Whitehall source told The Times, the UK may opt for a rapid 24-hour withdrawal from the country.

The proposal is one of three, alongside a several-day-long “medium” withdrawal and a more organised, longer-term operation.

Despite favouring the long-term option for safety purposes, the source added the UK is in “Washington’s hands”.

British soldiers and officials have previously spoken of trouble communicating with their US counterparts, with none the wiser on the length of their stay.

Harry Byrne

Harry Byrne

Related post